🧊 When: Daily sessions of 10-20 minutes, ideally morning for circadian rhythm support. Position device 15-30cm from face. Start with 10 minutes and gradually increase. Consistency matters more than session length—5x per week minimum for visible results within 8-12 weeks.

🎯 Specificity: Wavelengths matter—660nm (red) for surface skin, 850nm (near-infrared) for deeper tissue penetration. Look for devices with irradiance >40mW/cm² at treatment distance. Avoid devices that don’t specify wavelength and power output. LED panels work better than single-point devices for facial coverage.

🚫 Friction removal: Clean face before sessions (makeup/sunscreen blocks light penetration), wear eye protection if device is >100mW/cm², keep device clean, maintain consistent distance. Many fail because they use underpowered devices or inconsistent protocols.

📊 Tracking: Monitor skin texture changes, photograph weekly in consistent lighting, measure fine line depth if possible, track barrier recovery speed (how quickly irritation resolves), note improvements in overall radiance and skin tone evenness. Advanced: track collagen markers via skin imaging devices if accessible.

Discussion: Member asked whether spermidine supplementation is worth the cost, noting Bryan Johnson uses it but studies show only very high dosages (40mg+) might have impact, and the body regulates blood levels anyway.

The verdict: Current clinical evidence doesn’t support strong effects of spermidine on cognition, systemic polyamine levels, or other validated health endpoints at standard doses. However, mechanistic data for calorie restriction mimetic effects (AMPK activation) is relatively strong. Community members who supplement view it as worthwhile from an experimental longevity perspective if cost isn’t prohibitive, though effects are hard to evaluate objectively.

Consider this: Spermidine falls into the “promising mechanistic rationale but limited human evidence” category. If you’re operating on tight supplement budgets, prioritize interventions with stronger clinical backing. If experimenting within your budget, the downside risk appears low.

Discussion: A member asked who the most influential longevity experts in Europe are—wondering who represents Europe’s equivalent to David Sinclair, Bryan Johnson, or Huberman. One member mentioned Andrea Maier as top of their list.

The verdict: The community reframed the question from “most influential” to “best” in terms of practicability for everyday application without sacrificing depth. Björn Kurtenbach was highlighted as someone who balances accessible, actionable protocols with scientific rigor. The distinction matters: influence doesn’t always equal practical utility for implementation.

Consider this: Europe’s longevity landscape operates differently than the US—less celebrity-driven, more research-institution focused. When seeking guidance, prioritize experts whose recommendations you can actually implement rather than those with the largest platforms. Ask yourself: does this expert provide protocols I can execute, or just aspirational content I consume?

Discussion: A member asked which Aware testing package combinations others typically use, finding the package setup somewhat restrictive and wanting to know how the community navigates their options.

The verdict: Community members commonly combine the Longevity package with either Nutrition or Sports to get comprehensive coverage of main longevity markers plus iron and essential vitamins. Critical timing consideration: the Sports package takes 10 days for results, and Aware can’t provide partial results—meaning if you book Sports alongside other packages, you’ll wait the full 10 days for everything even if other panels are ready sooner.

Consider this: Package selection requires balancing comprehensiveness with turnaround time. If you need faster results, skip the Sports package and add it separately later. If timing isn’t critical and you want complete data in one draw, the Longevity + Sports/Nutrition combination maximizes biomarker coverage. Plan your testing schedule around when you actually need the data, not just when it’s convenient to draw blood.